Tweet
This isn't "bigger man" and I certainly am not "fallowing" you. I'm letting everyone else here know that you do not know what you are preaching because you have never tested exhaust on a running engine.
Now, read carefully and educate yourself:
I've completed over 3000 Engine Dynamometer Tests on naturally aspirated engines ranging from "street/strip" applications to full bore, top tier racing applications. THREE THOUSAND. How do I keep track of that? by logging data on each pull and using a naming convention that lets me easily count the number of types of tests I ran. Much of that is directly testing exhaust trying different headers, collector and runner dimensions, then tracking our data and reporting back what works. We've also tested cam profiles, compression ratios, valvetrain "lofting," and a number of other engine performance related subjects TO SEE IF WHAT'S SAID ON THE INTERNET IS ACCURATE (most of it is not). I've tested Vizard's approaches including two different groups who tried DV's "terminator chamber" design on headers trying to fit an optimized exhaust into an actual chassis.
Setting up a real engine, in a real dyno cell, and making real tests with real exhausts (you should see how many different exhaust designs hang on the wall at Barton Racing, a real shop ya know?) is not "keyboard racing" and it's not simply reading to everyone about what I read in a book I bought at Barnes and Noble for $23.
If you can't tell the difference, or are unwilling to accept that, then fine. You can talk out your rectum about any topic you want here because it's clear no one takes you seriously. But do NOT open your mouth telling others what I do, or do not do, especially when you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.
Tell me all about your experiences when YOU perform some kind of test on a running engine. Until then, you're a blathering clown simply wasting bandwidth on this forum.
Now, read carefully and educate yourself:
I've completed over 3000 Engine Dynamometer Tests on naturally aspirated engines ranging from "street/strip" applications to full bore, top tier racing applications. THREE THOUSAND. How do I keep track of that? by logging data on each pull and using a naming convention that lets me easily count the number of types of tests I ran. Much of that is directly testing exhaust trying different headers, collector and runner dimensions, then tracking our data and reporting back what works. We've also tested cam profiles, compression ratios, valvetrain "lofting," and a number of other engine performance related subjects TO SEE IF WHAT'S SAID ON THE INTERNET IS ACCURATE (most of it is not). I've tested Vizard's approaches including two different groups who tried DV's "terminator chamber" design on headers trying to fit an optimized exhaust into an actual chassis.
Setting up a real engine, in a real dyno cell, and making real tests with real exhausts (you should see how many different exhaust designs hang on the wall at Barton Racing, a real shop ya know?) is not "keyboard racing" and it's not simply reading to everyone about what I read in a book I bought at Barnes and Noble for $23.
If you can't tell the difference, or are unwilling to accept that, then fine. You can talk out your rectum about any topic you want here because it's clear no one takes you seriously. But do NOT open your mouth telling others what I do, or do not do, especially when you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.
Tell me all about your experiences when YOU perform some kind of test on a running engine. Until then, you're a blathering clown simply wasting bandwidth on this forum.
Comment