+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 53
  1. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    11,805
    Quote Originally Posted by skullbucket View Post
    You should just leave the 305 in it and add what cheap bolt ons you can and forget wasting any more money you don't have on it.
    You sure you belong to a hot rod board??.......

  2. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    over the top
    Posts
    556
    Quote Originally Posted by TC View Post
    You sure you belong to a hot rod board??.......
    Yea but wife losing job, budget, hiding buying parts from the wife, building a car thats worth only its weight is scrape price ETC, whats the use ?
    Ya know I go one step further and say, Really................ the "Power Tour", is this the car you really want to be remembered driving or being seen in by millions of hotrodders and pic takers?
    I guess I just have a higher standard of standards.
    Can't you find at least a $500 79 Malibu? If I wasn't going to drive a hotrod I would just rent a new Malibu and ride in comfort to each stop.

  3. #33
    BangShifter streetshark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin Northwoods
    Posts
    117
    Back in 2008 member Jim Rockford made a thread about a LT1 swap into a box style Caprice that turned out pretty good if I remember correctly.

    As for hiding buying parts from my wife, I was making a married-guy joke. I am in no way destitute nor eating ramen noodles every night. Just trying to be budget conscious and build a relatively fast, different car out of stuff that I have laying around. Add some go-fast goodies and go have fun. After all, isn't that the spirit of hot rodding? As long as it puts a smile on my face, than I consider it money well spent.

  4. #34
    Hero BangShifter jcharliem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperBuickGuy View Post
    ...Sell the 350 and use the money to buy better parts for the 406 - like 5.7 rods and pistons.
    If you need to purchase rods/pistons for a 406ci... why buy 5.7" rods when you could step up to 6.0" rods?
    Nitrous, baby!!...

  5. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    11,805
    Quote Originally Posted by jcharliem View Post
    If you need to purchase rods/pistons for a 406ci... why buy 5.7" rods when you could step up to 6.0" rods?
    The pin is already going to be in the oil ring with the 5.7's, why push it up further with a 6" rod??.......

  6. #36
    Legendary BangShifter SuperBuickGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Woodinville, WA
    Posts
    11,814
    Quote Originally Posted by jcharliem View Post
    If you need to purchase rods/pistons for a 406ci... why buy 5.7" rods when you could step up to 6.0" rods?
    moving the pin up .05 is pretty painless, 6.0 has some downsides (short skirt piston stability, moving the pin above the oil groove, etc) and in what he's talking about not worth it (all IMO). Jeff's car, absolflippinglutely, but in a DD/cruiser/might see a track once instead of his foxbody/never sees above 5500 rpms; probably not.
    A ninja editor
    who's heavily into Buicks

  7. #37
    Superhero BangShifter yellomalibu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    2,597
    I know of a few 406's that have done some surprising stuff with the original 5.565" rods with good bolts... For what the o/p intends to use this car for, going with a long rod isn't necessary, imo.

    BUT if you're going to buy ARP bolts and get the rods magnafluxed and re-sized, you've almost paid for a new set of H beam rods with 7/16" cap screws ... and as I said before, there is a much better selection of pistons for the 5.7 rod to get the compression where you want it.

  8. #38
    Legendary BangShifter JeffMcKC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    I am the Man in the Moon
    Posts
    6,601
    A lot of guys jump to a 6.0 rod the ring pack will make more power than the long rod will help, the little used 5.85 rod works very well in the 400 blocks
    Last edited by JeffMcKC; July 29th, 2012 at 06:30 AM.
    2007 SBN/A Drag Week Winner & First only SBN/A Car in the 9's Till 2012
    First to run in the .90s .80s and .70's in SBN/A
    2012 SSBN/A Drag Week Winner First in the 9.60's/ 9.67 @ 139 1.42 60'
    2013 SSBN/A Drag Week, Lets quit sand bagging, and let it rip!

  9. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    11,805
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffMcKC View Post
    A lot of guys jump to a 6.0 rod the ring pack will make more power than the long rod will help, the little used 5.85 rod works very well in the 400 blocks
    Years ago DF dyno'd a 400 SBC using the stock rod, a 5.7 rod and a 6 inch rod..... The stock rod produced the highest peak torque output with the lowest peak HP, the 6 inch rod made the most peak HP with the lowest torque output and the 5.7 rod made a couple of lb-ft of torque less than the stock rod and made a couple of HP less than the 6 inch rod, basically the 5.7 gave you the best of both worlds......... And one thing was very clear, as the rod got longer the low end torque output went down....

  10. #40
    Hero BangShifter jcharliem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by TC View Post
    ...basically the 5.7 gave you the best of both worlds...
    Pffttt. I bet that's the very reason you have 5.7 rods in the "jack stand" Camaro.

    Let's re-open the debate of what "rpm's faster." I'm thinking you'll Google up everything he can find on 5.7 rods...just because that's what is in the jack stander.
    Nitrous, baby!!...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts