Low buck 318/360 stroker for a 91 Dakota-any suggestions?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • min301
    Legendary BangShifter
    • Oct 2007
    • 8552

    #1

    Low buck 318/360 stroker for a 91 Dakota-any suggestions?

    This is going to be a low buck, cheap fun street/race truck.

    Thinking of a stroked 318/360, how about some input from you
    Mopar guy's?
  • JOES66FURY

    #2
    Re: Low buck 318/360 stroker for a 91 Dakota-any suggestions?

    Check out "hughes engine" they have tons of stuff for the Magnum engines and even have build plans, i know guys who have stroked the 360 and they are plenty stout, I uderstand the heads and intake are what choke the magnum 360's....Mine is strong, runs great and has withstood abuse lesser enines couldnt handle....Its a good platform to build from IMO...Keep it low buck....lifters/M1 intake/throtte body/injectors/head work/shorty headers/3" single exhaust... have seen a like set up lay down 400+hp and it had a 100 shot on it...in a 99 Dakota...check out DTW truck Forum, they ae kind of uppity and stuffy but there will be tons of info for you there to pour over

    Comment

    • min301
      Legendary BangShifter
      • Oct 2007
      • 8552

      #3
      Re: Low buck 318/360 stroker for a 91 Dakota-any suggestions?

      It will be carb'd, that much is for sure.
      A good basis, with hyd. roller cam, aftermarket heads and intake.

      The Dakota is a 3.9l v6 right now.

      Comment

      • StrokerAspen
        BangShifter
        • Feb 2008
        • 145

        #4
        Re: Low buck 318/360 stroker for a 91 Dakota-any suggestions?

        My 434ci. If biult out of a 318 block ;D it has made 520BHP so far, at 5900RPM. That was with ported J heads and a solid roller cam. MUCH more to come ;)

        Comment

        • min301
          Legendary BangShifter
          • Oct 2007
          • 8552

          #5
          Re: Low buck 318/360 stroker for a 91 Dakota-any suggestions?

          PM me some suggestions, based on your application.

          Comment

          • BBR
            Chief Do'er
            • Nov 2007
            • 11744

            #6
            Re: Low buck 318/360 stroker for a 91 Dakota-any suggestions?

            If it's a Magnum block, there are a couple of things to remember:

            318 mags use a 360 oil pan
            Magnum blocks cannot use standard LA heads unless you figure out how to oil the shaft rockers
            Magnums use a different imbalance on the balancer


            Here's what I would do:

            '87 318 roller block (non-magnum)
            cast 4" crank
            Diamond shelf piston
            stock rods
            nice custom hydraulic roller (230°+@ 0.050")
            Edelbrock head
            4bbl intake Perf RPM
            750 double pumper

            I think that would put a pretty big smile on your face.
            Life is short. Be a do'er and not a shoulda done'er.
            1969 Galaxie 500 https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...ild-it-s-alive
            1998 Mustang GT https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...60-and-a-turbo
            1983 Mustang GT 545/552/302/Turbo302/552 http://www.bangshift.com/forum/forum...485-bbr-s-83gt
            1973 F-250 BBF Turbo Truck http://www.bangshift.com/forum/forum...uck-conversion
            1986 Ford Ranger EFI 545/C6 https://bangshift.com/forum/forum/ba...tooth-and-nail

            Comment

            • StrokerAspen
              BangShifter
              • Feb 2008
              • 145

              #7
              Re: Low buck 318/360 stroker for a 91 Dakota-any suggestions?

              I like your idea, But I wouldn't use a roller teen block. They are a bit thin in the cylinder walls. Use an older block and grind the valley to clearance the roller lifters. ;)

              Comment

              • min301
                Legendary BangShifter
                • Oct 2007
                • 8552

                #8
                Re: Low buck 318/360 stroker for a 91 Dakota-any suggestions?

                Thanks for some ideas boys.

                Comment

                Working...