Glad I caught up w/ you Dave. We've missed you out in the print world.
Jeff Smith (you know him) said that the Vortec head on an HT383 "would create excessive static compression ratio with a flat top piston", but he didn't say how high "excessive" was. (I think he meant with 8 flat top pistons, but that's another discussion.) Humor me and consider propane fuel for a minute.
As a car guy (always have been, '66 & '67 big block SS Chevelles), a hot rodder/classic trucker (chopped and lowered '72 Chevy Super C10), corner carver ('89 Chrysler Conquest TSi), and 4x4 enthusiast (Jeep TJ Wrangler) I think there may be something for us crossover gear heads here.
The SBC in a Jeep is an old trick for cost effective power gains, and propane fuel is a great alternative for off roaders (we're all just gearheads, right?). With propane's higher octane rating and lower power content, a mild mannered high torque high compression solution may be just the ticket for a good rock crawler.
Anyone have any thoughts or insight on this setup?
Jeff Smith (you know him) said that the Vortec head on an HT383 "would create excessive static compression ratio with a flat top piston", but he didn't say how high "excessive" was. (I think he meant with 8 flat top pistons, but that's another discussion.) Humor me and consider propane fuel for a minute.
As a car guy (always have been, '66 & '67 big block SS Chevelles), a hot rodder/classic trucker (chopped and lowered '72 Chevy Super C10), corner carver ('89 Chrysler Conquest TSi), and 4x4 enthusiast (Jeep TJ Wrangler) I think there may be something for us crossover gear heads here.
The SBC in a Jeep is an old trick for cost effective power gains, and propane fuel is a great alternative for off roaders (we're all just gearheads, right?). With propane's higher octane rating and lower power content, a mild mannered high torque high compression solution may be just the ticket for a good rock crawler.
Anyone have any thoughts or insight on this setup?
Comment