Solid mounts

[AdvAutoBob]

I use Moroso solid engine mounts with a fabricated torque link, poly trans mount. It's no Cadillac, but really, no noticeable engine vibrations either. Guess I'm used to that kind of stuff LOL

[greenXpress]

getting poly and adding a torque link. Might need it (I hope) just scored a dominator and big tubed hookers. (I feel so bad talking dirty)

Thanks guys.

[Orange65]

When you say big tube- how big are you talking, Jesse? I might be interested to see if they will fit my 65 too.

[greenXpress]

I guess I should of said bigger than I have. Got Hooker 2841-3HKR Dark Side with 2" primaries and 3 1/2" collector. (Scratch and dent from Holley's e-bay store) Only a small scuff under one of the primaries was all I could find. I have been over my head with a bunch of issues and plan to get all this on in a couple of weeks.

[MR P-BODY]

[QUOTE=STINEY;n972622]The chassis will react quicker with solid mounts.

I like squirrels' method....best compromise.

Solids will transmit more noise and vibration, but most of us will not even notice. Probably enjoy that extra noise/movement more than be annoyed by it. The OEM do their best to keep that stuff to a minimum so Grandma is happy with her purchase.

My solids in the Cadistang. Affordillac engineering on parade.

I agree... I run front and mid motor plates on my rod and cant
tell its a solid mount engine... if the engine has been balanced
it should be far better than the factory balance and no where
near as bad