Not to take anything away from what Larson and BSC have done to push the Unlimited envelope and bring the "fastest street car" bragging rights back to the USA . . . but there's a point that's worthy of some discussion. . . . And it's not the composite versus OEM body point that's so often discussed.
Converting Larson's truck into 6.19 E.T. trim isn't just a simple matter of bolting on the slicks, wheelie bars, and chutes, flipping some fuel feed valves, and changing the tune. It's a huge, time-consuming operation that involves most of the foregoing PLUS changing body parts, removing the cooling system, and installing a completely different fuel system (and probably several other things I didn't see).
The lengthy changeover apparently burned them at Noble and prevented any change of winning DW '14. The truck also takes too long between rounds to run in a typical street car hot-lap-style contest, as evidenced by Larson not making the Round 2 lane call in the Heads-up Shootout.
All of this raises the question: Do the extensive changes necessary to Larson's truck make it not really a "street" vehicle when it runs?
I mean given enough time and creativity, one could probably bolt and unbolt enough stuff onto a slightly-modified dragster and claim it's a "street car" . . . but would it be? Does the "fastest street car" business need some limits as to how far you can vary your car from its street configuration and still claim it's a street car?
Another question . . . In many other forms of record setting, the competitor has to "back up" the record run with another run that's within a certain percentage of the record. Does a vehicle which requires so much prep and prodding that it apparently cannot do a timely backup run really have a legitimate claim be being a record-holder?
What say you, Bangshifters?
Converting Larson's truck into 6.19 E.T. trim isn't just a simple matter of bolting on the slicks, wheelie bars, and chutes, flipping some fuel feed valves, and changing the tune. It's a huge, time-consuming operation that involves most of the foregoing PLUS changing body parts, removing the cooling system, and installing a completely different fuel system (and probably several other things I didn't see).
The lengthy changeover apparently burned them at Noble and prevented any change of winning DW '14. The truck also takes too long between rounds to run in a typical street car hot-lap-style contest, as evidenced by Larson not making the Round 2 lane call in the Heads-up Shootout.
All of this raises the question: Do the extensive changes necessary to Larson's truck make it not really a "street" vehicle when it runs?
I mean given enough time and creativity, one could probably bolt and unbolt enough stuff onto a slightly-modified dragster and claim it's a "street car" . . . but would it be? Does the "fastest street car" business need some limits as to how far you can vary your car from its street configuration and still claim it's a street car?
Another question . . . In many other forms of record setting, the competitor has to "back up" the record run with another run that's within a certain percentage of the record. Does a vehicle which requires so much prep and prodding that it apparently cannot do a timely backup run really have a legitimate claim be being a record-holder?
What say you, Bangshifters?
Comment