Carb spacer... Aluminum or Phenolic?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 1trickpony
    Superhero BangShifter
    • Jun 2010
    • 1102

    #1

    Carb spacer... Aluminum or Phenolic?

    Aluminum or Phenolic
    Open or 4 holes?

    Jeff
    Follow My Build
  • Barry Donovan
    No Life Outside BangShift.com
    • Jul 2009
    • 16928

    #2
    aluminum
    Previously boxer3main
    the death rate and fairy tales cannot kill the nature left behind.

    Comment

    • BlackoutSteve
      Superhero BangShifter
      • Oct 2007
      • 2779

      #3
      My choice would be phenolic for less heat transfer/better insulation.
      4 hole for stronger vacuum signal, less plenum volume and more for lower rpm.
      Open for more plenum volume and higher rpm.

      Comment

      • Stich496
        Banned
        • Apr 2011
        • 3269

        #4
        Originally posted by 1trickpony View Post
        Aluminum or Phenolic
        Open or 4 holes?

        depends on engine set up..
        it's trial and error..
        wilson 4 hole is very nice, makes power and is pricey

        Comment

        • 1trickpony
          Superhero BangShifter
          • Jun 2010
          • 1102

          #5
          I am just looking for less heat transfer, and probably low end if I had to choose.
          So pheonic 4 hole?
          Last edited by 1trickpony; April 22, 2011, 04:57 PM.
          Jeff
          Follow My Build

          Comment

          • Beagle
            "Flounder"
            • Apr 2011
            • 13804

            #6
            MDF... and experiment ?
            Flying south, with a flock of bird dogs.

            Comment

            • DanStokes
              Ancient LSR Guy
              • Oct 2007
              • 28694

              #7
              You will have to experiment and see what works with your setup. I made a phenolic spacer using regular wood working tools - no big deal. As Beags said, you can make 'em out of MDF for cheap and see what works - it has similar properties to phenolic but is much cheaper and easier to work. Try an open and closed one and see how your engine responds then you can make/buy a phenolic one (I think the MDF would eventually deteriorate). Fun project and an excellent tech thread for BangShift - maybe get data on a strip if cheap dyno time is not available.

              Aluminum will transfer heat like crazy - that's what it's good at. If the goal is to keep the carb cool, not the way to go.

              Dan
              Last edited by DanStokes; April 23, 2011, 05:26 AM.

              Comment

              • mustang13
                Superhero BangShifter
                • Apr 2008
                • 3379

                #8
                Jeff, NAPA use to sell a Holley flange carb gasket/spacer, was like a 1/2" think, made of paper-cardboard-wood like material and worked awesome on low rise dual plane intakes.

                https://www.napaonline.com/Catalog/C...723_0006391677

                Moroso is stuff is top notch too, IMO.



                A short open spacer over a dual plane will speed up intake velocity and plenum balance.

                Beware of JEG's/Summit brand "Phenolic" spacers, most are just plastic that is unstable at high temps and will warp. I found this out the hard way when a Jeg's spacer warped on me cracking the baseplate of the carb.

                That said, the best carb spacer to use has spray bars and solenoids hooked to it, and makes more power than any other spacer! : )
                Last edited by mustang13; April 23, 2011, 08:34 AM.
                Jeremy George in Windsor NY

                Comment

                • ROY
                  Tire Chirper
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 54

                  #9
                  A lot has to do with you manifold,single plane or dual plane,and what RPMs you want the engine to work best.I have done extensive testing on my drag race engine using a Victor jr.manifold and 750HP.The car is a 4-speed,leave at 6600,shift at 7200,out the back at 8000.My conclussion was a 1" spacer in either 4 hole or open made no difference on the track on the same day.I ended up with a tapered 4 hole as that was on the engine after the final tests. ROY.

                  Comment

                  Working...